Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-09-01 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52s has an overall score of 91.1, which is better than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition's score of 77.4. The Samsung Galaxy A52s is a newer device than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, although it's a lot heavier and way thicker. The Moto Z2 Force Edition's processing unit is very similar to the processor in Galaxy A52s, and although the Moto Z2 Force Edition has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition has a little sharper screen than Galaxy A52s, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better quantity of pixels per inch in the display and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution. Galaxy A52s features a little bit better storage capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has an external SD slot that supports up to 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal memory.
The Galaxy A52s takes greater pictures and videos than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Galaxy A52s also has a way bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a much higher resolution camera and a larger diafragm aperture.
Samsung Galaxy A52s features a much better battery life than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 2730mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.