Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-09-01 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Plastic | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52s is much better than the Moto Z2 Play, with a 91.1 score against 77.4. Galaxy A52s is a newer phone than Moto Z2 Play, but it's thicker and way heavier. Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with a little bit better looking display than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a little better pixel count in each inch in the display, a larger screen and a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The Galaxy A52s has just a bit more storage capacity for apps and games than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A52s features a bit superior processor than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also has more RAM.
The Galaxy A52s features a superior battery lifetime than Moto Z2 Play, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. Samsung Galaxy A52s takes much better photos and videos than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for capturing photographs and video in low-light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also counts with a camera in the back with a way higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.