Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2021-09-01 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52s has an overall score of 91.1, which is much better than the Motorola Moto Z3's 77.6 general score. Galaxy A52s's construction is notably newer than the Motorola Moto Z3's, but it is somewhat heavier and thicker. These phones work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy A52s has the previous 11 version while Motorola Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie.
Motorola Moto Z3's CPU is very similar to the Samsung Galaxy A52s one, and although the Motorola Moto Z3 has less RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. Motorola Moto Z3 has a screen that's very similar to the Samsung Galaxy A52s one, although the Motorola Moto Z3 has a just a bit less pixels per display inch, a little worse 1080 x 2160px resolution and a little smaller screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s features a slightly better storage for games and applications than Motorola Moto Z3, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory. The Galaxy A52s counts with a superior battery life than Moto Z3, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with a lot better camera than Motorola Moto Z3, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also has a much larger sensor taking way higher quality photos, a lot more mega-pixels back-facing camera and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better photos and videos in poorly lited situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.