Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-09-01 | 2018-06-29 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52s has an overall score of 91.1, which is better than the Motorola Moto Z3 Play's overall score of 76.3. The Samsung Galaxy A52s body is incredibly newer, but somewhat heavier and thicker than Motorola Moto Z3 Play. Galaxy A52s has a little bit better looking screen than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because it has a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution, a little bit more pixels per inch of display and a little bit larger display.
Galaxy A52s counts with a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy A52s also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy A52s has a greater camera than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for capturing photos and video in low light environments, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A52s also counts with a way bigger sensor and a much better 64 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s has slightly more storage capacity for games and applications than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits 976 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy A52s counts with a way better battery life than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.