Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-09-01 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52s has an overall score of 91.1, which is just a bit better than the Motorola razr (2020)'s overall score of 87. These devices come with the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't see any differences regarding that. Samsung Galaxy A52s is a newer and just a little bit lighter device than the Motorola razr (2020), although it is a bit thicker.
Galaxy A52s counts with a bit better looking display than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a just a bit more pixels per inch of display, a bit higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a little bigger screen. The Motorola razr (2020) features a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A52s, and although they both have 8 cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy A52s features a better memory capacity for apps and games than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports up to 1 TB. The Galaxy A52s has a way better battery duration than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 61% bigger battery capacity.
The Galaxy A52s has a little bit better camera than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy A52s also counts with a bigger camera sensor and a way higher 64 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.