Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 15 |
| 2021-09-01 | 2025-04-24 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | -- |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White | -- |
| Plastic | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | -- |
| Super AMOLED | LTPO |
| 405 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52s has a global score of 91.1, which is much better than the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025)'s global score of 79.2. These devices use Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy A52s has older 11 version and Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has Android 15 version. The Samsung Galaxy A52s has a much better looking screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a bit smaller display.
Galaxy A52s features a really superior processing power than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has 10 GB less RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A52s, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 384 GB more internal storage.
Galaxy A52s shoots a little bit better videos and photos than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A52s also has a camera with much more MP. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than Galaxy A52s, because it has a 4 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.