Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-09-01 | 2019-03-03 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Blue |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52s has a score of 91.1, which is much better than Nokia 9 PureView's 76.4 global score. Galaxy A52s's design is noticeably newer than Nokia 9 PureView's, although it's a little bit heavier and a little bit thicker. The Nokia 9 PureView features a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A52s. They have 6 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core processor.
The Nokia 9 PureView counts with a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A52s, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution and more pixels per display inch. Galaxy A52s has a very superior storage for applications and games than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A52s also has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with longer battery life than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3320mAh. The Samsung Galaxy A52s features a much better camera than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, a F1.8 camera aperture and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also has a back facing camera with way more MP and a lot bigger camera sensor capturing way higher quality videos and pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.