Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-09-01 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Cyber shade |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52s has a global score of 91.1, which is much better than nubia Red Magic 3S's score of 75.8. Both devices in our current comparison include Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A52s has the previous 11 version and nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie. The Samsung Galaxy A52s construction is newer, somewhat thinner and lighter than nubia Red Magic 3S.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has a little better processing power than Galaxy A52s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has more RAM memory. The nubia Red Magic 3S and Galaxy A52s have really similar displays, because although the nubia Red Magic 3S has a little worse 1080 x 2340 resolution and a bit worse screen density, it also counts with a bit bigger display.
The Galaxy A52s has a bit better camera than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low-light photos and videos, and they both have the same video definition, the Galaxy A52s also counts with a camera with lot more megapixels, better 30 frames per second video frame rates and a bigger sensor capturing better quality photographs and videos.
The Galaxy A52s counts with a bigger memory capacity for games and applications than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1 TB. Nubia Red Magic 3S features a bit superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A52s, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.