Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-09-01 | 2020-09-02 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Sonic silver |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52s has a general score of 91.1, which is much better than nubia Red Magic 5S's general score of 76.2. Galaxy A52s's design is newer, lighter and thinner than the nubia Red Magic 5S. Both of these devices use Android OS, but the Galaxy A52s has 11 version and nubia Red Magic 5S has Android 10, so it provides the user some nice extra features.
Nubia Red Magic 5S features a little bit better looking screen than Galaxy A52s, because although it has a little bit lower display pixel density and a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a little bit larger display. The Samsung Galaxy A52s features a lot bigger storage capacity for games and applications than nubia Red Magic 5S, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1 TB.
Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a little better processing power than Galaxy A52s, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has more RAM. The nubia Red Magic 5S and Galaxy A52s both feature incredibly similar batteries performance. The nubia Red Magic 5S has a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy A52s, and although they both have a camera with a 64 mega pixels, the same diafragm aperture and the same back camera sensor size, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a way better video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.