Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-09-01 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Ocean |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52s is a bit better than the OPPO Find X2 Pro, having a 91.1 score against 83.1. These phones include Android OS, but the Galaxy A52s has 11 version and OPPO Find X2 Pro has Android 10, counting with some extra features. Galaxy A52s is a newer cellphone, and it is also a little bit thinner and just a little lighter than the OPPO Find X2 Pro.
OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A52s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has more RAM. The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a better display than Galaxy A52s, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3168px, a higher display density and a bit bigger screen.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a quite bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A52s, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. OPPO Find X2 Pro has a camera that's just as good as the camera in Galaxy A52s, because although the OPPO Find X2 Pro has a worse (4K) video resolution and a way lower resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a larger aperture and a larger back camera sensor which gives a higher photo and video quality.
The Galaxy A52s features a little better battery life than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4260mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.