Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-09-01 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52s is better than the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, getting a global score of 91.1 against 79.9. The Samsung Galaxy A52s body has the same thickness than the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, but it is just a little lighter. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A52s has an older 11 version and Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has Android 14 version.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a little bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A52s, although it has a little lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little bit worse pixel density, they both have a same size screen. Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with a much better hardware performance than Galaxy A25 5G. Both have 8 processing cores and a 6 GB RAM memory.
The Galaxy A25 5G and Galaxy A52s have similar memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos, both of them have equal internal storage capacity and a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A52s features a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have the same video frame rates, a F1.8 camera aperture and the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also has a way bigger sensor which provides a lot better image and video quality and a much better resolution back camera.
Galaxy A25 5G features just a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy A52s, because it has an 11 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.