Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-09-01 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52s has an overall score of 91.1, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy A51's score of 85.5. Although Galaxy A52s is newer than Samsung Galaxy A51, it is just a little bit thicker and a little heavier. Both phones in our current comparison use the same Android 11 OS. Galaxy A52s has just a little better performance than Galaxy A51, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy A52s also has a larger amount of RAM.
Galaxy A51 has a display that is just as good as the Galaxy A52s one, they have the same pixel density, the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a same size display. Galaxy A52s has just a bit better camera than Galaxy A51, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A52s also has a bigger back camera sensor, a larger camera aperture for better photos in poorly lited environments and a lot more megapixels camera.
Galaxy A52s counts with a slightly better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy A51, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A52s also has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with a little better battery life than Galaxy A51, because it has a 13% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.