Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-09-01 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Plastic | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52s is slightly better than the Galaxy F62, having a 91.1 score against 88.1. Both devices in this comparison review use the same Android 11 operating system, so they should provide you identical operating system features. The Galaxy A52s is a thinner and lighter phone than Galaxy F62, even when they were released only 6 months apart.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with just a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy F62, and although they both have a 6 GB RAM memory, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also has a higher number of cores (although slower). Galaxy F62 features a little bit better screen than Galaxy A52s, because although it has a just a little lower amount of pixels per screen inch, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a little larger display.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s features just a bit better camera than Galaxy F62. Both of them have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a same resolution back camera, a 0.59 inches sensor, a F1.8 aperture and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates. Galaxy F62 and Galaxy A52s count with very similar memory capacity to store more games and applications, both of them have an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB and exactly the same internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 has a much longer battery performance than Galaxy A52s, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.