Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-09-01 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Fold is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A52s, having a 97.6 score against 91.1. The Samsung Galaxy Fold design is thinner than the Samsung Galaxy A52s, although it is much heavier and was released 2 years before. Both of these devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Fold has a more recent 9.0 Pie version and Samsung Galaxy A52s has Android 11, so it offers some extra features.
The Galaxy A52s counts with a little bit better looking display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a just a little greater pixels amount in each inch of display. Galaxy Fold counts with a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A52s, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Fold also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Galaxy Fold counts with a better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A52s, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory. The Galaxy A52s shoots better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for low light photos and videos and worse 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same video resolution, the Galaxy A52s also counts with a way more mega-pixels back camera and a way larger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot higher quality videos and pictures.
The Galaxy A52s features just a bit better battery duration than Galaxy Fold, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 4380mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.