Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 5.1 |
| 2021-09-01 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Plastic | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52s is better than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, getting a 91.1 score against 79.3. The Galaxy A52s construction is much newer, but just a little bit thicker and just a little bit heavier than the Samsung Galaxy Note 5. Both of these phones use Android OS, but Galaxy A52s has newer 11 version while Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1, so it provides you a couple nice extra features and optimized performance.
Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with a better performing processor than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a greater number of faster cores and 2 GB more RAM. The Galaxy Note 5 has a sharper display than Galaxy A52s, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better count of pixels per inch in the screen and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440.
The Galaxy A52s has a much greater memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note 5, because it has more internal storage capacity and an external SD slot that admits up to 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A52s features a much longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 50% larger battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s features a much better camera than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also has a larger camera aperture for better low light photography, a back-facing camera with way more MP and a lot bigger camera sensor capturing way higher quality photos and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.