Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-09-01 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a global score of 93.6, which is a little bit better than Galaxy A52s's score of 91.1. Both phones in this review have the same Android 11 OS, so both of them should provide the user all the same operating system features. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G body is just a little bit thinner than Galaxy A52s, but it's a little bit heavier and was released many years before.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A52s, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G also has more RAM. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features a little more vivid display than Galaxy A52s, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3040px, a just a bit better number of pixels in each inch in the display and a little larger display.
Galaxy A52s has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for shooting photos or video in poorly lited environments and worse 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same video definition, the Galaxy A52s also counts with a camera in the back with much more mega pixels and a lot larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Galaxy A52s counts with a greater memory to install applications and games than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1 TB. The Galaxy S10 5G counts with a battery life that is just as good as the battery performance in Galaxy A52s.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.