Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-09-01 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a bit better than Galaxy A52s, having a 98 score against 91.1. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's body is older, a little thicker and somewhat heavier than Galaxy A52s. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has newer 13 version and Galaxy A52s has Android 11 version, offering some extra features and a performance increase.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a slightly better display than Samsung Galaxy A52s, because it has more pixels per screen inch, a little bigger screen and a better 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution. Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with just a bit more storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A52s, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a larger amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G takes much better pictures and videos than Galaxy A52s, because although it has a tinier camera sensor, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also counts with a much better 7680x4320 video quality and a way higher resolution back-facing camera.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a little longer battery life than Galaxy A52s, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.