Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-09-01 | -- |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | -- |
| 6.67 ounces | -- |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White | -- |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52s has an overall score of 91.1, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy S25's global score of 82.6. Both phones we compare here use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A52s has 11 version and Samsung Galaxy S25 has Android 14 version. Galaxy S25 features a better display than Galaxy A52s, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a bit greater display pixel density.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s features a very superior processor than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Galaxy S25 features just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A52s, because although it has a way worse 50 megapixels resolution back camera, and they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy S25 also counts with a bigger camera sensor shooting higher quality videos and photos and a way higher 7680x4320 video definition.
The Galaxy A52s features a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S25, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A52s also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy A52s counts with just a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy S25, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.