Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-09-01 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Black |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 405 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52s has a general score of 91.1, which is better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro's 80.1 global score. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A52s has the older 11 version and Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo. The Galaxy A52s design is newer, noticeably lighter and much thinner than Galaxy XCover FieldPro.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has just a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A52s, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixels amount in each inch in the display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. The Galaxy A52s features much more memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A52s, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a battery performance that is just as good as the Samsung Galaxy A52s one. The Samsung Galaxy A52s has a greater camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 video quality, a much higher resolution camera in the back and a much bigger back camera sensor shooting much better quality videos and pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.