Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-09-01 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Black |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52s has a score of 91.1, which is better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro's 81 general score. Samsung Galaxy A52s's design is newer, thinner and somewhat lighter than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro. These devices use the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't perceive any differences regarding that.
The Galaxy A52s features a bit superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy A52s also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Galaxy XCover Pro and Galaxy A52s count with very similar displays, because although the Galaxy XCover Pro has a little bit smaller screen and a bit worse 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, it also counts with a just a bit higher screen density.
Galaxy A52s features a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 64 GB more internal storage and an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy A52s shoots a lot better photos and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a way larger camera sensor which provides a way better photo and video quality, a lot higher video definition and a back camera with a lot better resolution.
Galaxy A52s features a bit superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has an 11% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.