Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-09-01 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52s has a score of 91.1, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy Z Flip's score of 88.5. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A52s has 11 version and Galaxy Z Flip has Android 12. Samsung Galaxy A52s's body is newer than the Galaxy Z Flip's, although it's thicker and a little bit heavier.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A52s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features just a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A52s, because it has a little bit larger screen, a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2636px and a just a bit better amount of pixels per display inch.
Galaxy A52s shoots much better photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has slower video frame rate, and they both have a F1.8 aperture and the same (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A52s also counts with a lot bigger camera sensor and a back-facing camera with a lot higher 64 mega-pixels resolution.
The Galaxy A52s features a greater storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1 TB. Galaxy A52s counts with better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.