Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-09-01 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a general score of 94.6, which is a bit better than the Galaxy A52s's 91.1 overall score. Both phones in this comparison review come with the same Android 11 OS (operating system). The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is an older and heavier device than the Galaxy A52s, but Samsung made it thinner anyway.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a display that is just as good as Galaxy A52s's display, because although the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a just a bit less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a bigger screen and a better resolution of 1768 x 2208 pixels. The Galaxy A52s features a bigger storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bit better performance than Galaxy A52s, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a battery lifetime that's just as good as the battery lifetime in Galaxy A52s.
The Galaxy A52s has a much better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy A52s also counts with a bigger back camera sensor taking better quality photographs and a camera with a much better 64 megapixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.