Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-09-01 | 2018-04-05 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 483 pixels per inch |
| -- | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52s has a global score of 91.1, which is much better than Xperia XZ2 Compact's score of 79. Samsung Galaxy A52s's body is incredibly newer and notably thinner, but heavier than the Xperia XZ2 Compact. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A52s has 11 version while Xperia XZ2 Compact has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The Xperia XZ2 Compact features a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A52s, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2160 resolution and a really smaller display, it also counts with a bit more pixels per display inch. The Samsung Galaxy A52s features a much bigger storage for applications and games than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has an external SD slot that holds up to 1 TB and more internal memory capacity.
The Xperia XZ2 Compact features just a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A52s, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Samsung Galaxy A52s features a better camera than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better low-light photography and videos, a back-facing camera with a way higher resolution and a much larger sensor providing a lot better image quality.
The Galaxy A52s counts with a superior battery duration than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.