Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-09-01 | 2017-04-05 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.68 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Black, Blue and Silver |
| Plastic | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52s is better than Xperia XZs, with a 91.1 score against 77.2. Galaxy A52s's design is notably newer, but just a little bit thicker and heavier than the Xperia XZs. The Galaxy A52s has a bit better processing unit than Xperia XZs, because it has a larger amount of RAM and 4 more cpu cores.
Galaxy A52s and Xperia XZs feature really similar displays, because although the Xperia XZs has a really smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 1920, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per display inch. The Sony Xperia XZs has a little bit better camera than Galaxy A52s, although it has a way worse resolution back-facing camera, a lot tinier back camera sensor taking much lower quality photos and videos, a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for low light captures and a worse (4K) video quality.
Samsung Galaxy A52s features a way bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1 TB. Galaxy A52s counts with a much better battery duration than Xperia XZs, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.