Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 90.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-09-01 | 2020-05-08 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Blasting black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 484 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52s has a general score of 91.1, which is a bit better than the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro's global score of 90.1. The Samsung Galaxy A52s is a newer cellphone, and it's also somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A52s has a newer 11 version and Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has Android 10 version, providing the user a lot of extra features and some performance improvements.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a bit better performance than Galaxy A52s, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has 2 GB more RAM. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a little bit better display than Galaxy A52s, because it has a just a little higher screen density, a little larger display and a higher 1440 x 3120 resolution.
Galaxy A52s counts with a quite bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features just a little better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A52s, because it has an 11 percent more battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a bit better camera than Galaxy A52s, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, a same size back camera sensor, the same camera aperture and the same resolution back camera, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has better 60 frames per second video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.