Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-09-01 | 2019-08-20 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52s is much better than the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, having a score of 91.1 against 82.7. Samsung Galaxy A52s is a way newer cellphone, and it is also just a bit lighter and a little thinner than the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro. Both phones we compare here use Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A52s has 11 version while Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has Android 10 version, providing lots of additional features and some performance improvements.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a bit better looking screen than Galaxy A52s, although it has a little smaller screen, a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a bit worse pixels density. The Samsung Galaxy A52s features a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1 TB.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A52s. Both of them have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core processing unit. The Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with a bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because although it has slower video frame rate, and they both have a same size camera aperture and the same video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also counts with a lot better 64 mega pixels resolution back camera and a bigger back camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
Galaxy A52s features just a bit better battery performance than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because it has a 13% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.