Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 88.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-09-01 | 2019-09-24 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.08 x 2.85 x 0.41 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 8.50 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Black |
| Plastic | Titanium |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2250 x 2088 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 389 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4050mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52s is slightly better than the Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha, having a 91.1 score against 88.9. Both devices in our current comparison come with Android operating system, but Galaxy A52s has a newer 11 version while Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha has Android 10 version. The Galaxy A52s is a newer phone, and it's also extremely lighter and somewhat thinner than the Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha has a little more vivid display than Galaxy A52s, because although it has a bit inferior pixel quantity per inch of screen, it also counts with a better 2088 x 2250 resolution and a larger display. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha features a quite bigger memory to install applications and games than Galaxy A52s, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha has a little bit better performance than Galaxy A52s, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy A52s has a little longer battery performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 4050mAh.
Galaxy A52s counts with a superior camera than Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha, although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low-light photos and videos, a lot lower 64 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera, a lot tinier back-facing camera sensor providing a way lower image quality and a lower 3840x2160 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.