Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-09-01 | 2021-04-28 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 229.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio G95 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A55 and Arm Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Arm Mali-G76 MC4 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52s is better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, having a 91.1 score against 78.2. Galaxy A52s's body has the same thickness than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, but it's just a little bit heavier. Both of these phones use the same Android 11 operating system. The Galaxy A52s counts with a bit better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S. Both of them have the same number of cores and 6 GB of RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S has a better display than Galaxy A52s, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400px resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S also counts with a quite greater count of pixels in each inch of screen. The Samsung Galaxy A52s has a lot better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S. They have a same size diafragm aperture and a same resolution camera.
Samsung Galaxy A52s has a much better storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1 TB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S counts with a little better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A52s, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.