Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 91.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 12 |
| 2021-09-01 | 2022-11-01 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.41 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.32 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 13.97 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer has a general score of 91.5, which is just a bit better than Galaxy A52s's 91.1 overall score. Both phones in our current comparison have Android operating system, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer has a more recent 12 version while Galaxy A52s has Android 11. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer is a newer phone than Galaxy A52s, although it's just a bit thicker and a little bit heavier.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer has a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A52s, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer also has a larger amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer has a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A52s, because although it has a just a bit lower count of pixels per inch in the screen, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer also counts with a little larger screen.
The Galaxy A52s counts with a better memory to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports up to 1 TB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A52s, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer also has a larger back camera sensor which offers a higher photo and video quality, a camera in the back with a way higher 200 mega-pixels resolution and a bigger diafragm aperture for better captures and video in low-light situations.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 4300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.