Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 13 |
| 2021-09-01 | 2024-01-15 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.34 x 2.95 x 28.98 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | -- |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Forest Green, Lavender Purple and Midnight Black |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio G99 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | -- |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52s is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro, having a overall score of 91.1 against 77.1. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy A52s has the older 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has Android 13 version. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has a bit better screen than Galaxy A52s, because although it has a little bit worse display density, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro also counts with a bit larger screen.
Samsung Galaxy A52s features a very superior processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro counts with a lot bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy A52s, and although they both have a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro also has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro takes a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy A52s, because it has a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels, a bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a larger aperture. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has just a bit longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A52s, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.