Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat |
| 2021-09-01 | 2018-02-22 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.38 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 8.91 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52s has a score of 91.1, which is way better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro's general score of 75.8. Both devices we compare here have Android operating system, but Galaxy A52s has an older 11 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Although Galaxy A52s is notably newer than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, it is a little bit heavier and just a bit thicker.
The Galaxy A52s counts with just a bit better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, because it has a little bigger display, a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a bit better pixels density. The Galaxy A52s has a bit superior CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro. They have a Octa-Core CPU and the same RAM amount.
Galaxy A52s shoots way better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, because it has a back camera with much more megapixels, a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better photography and video in low light situations and a lot higher 3840x2160 video definition. The Samsung Galaxy A52s has a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A52s has a little longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.