Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-09-01 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 283.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52s is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, with a 91.1 score against 76.6. Both of these devices work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A52s has newer 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has Android 10 version, counting with some nice extra features. Galaxy A52s's design is newer, a little bit thinner and just a little bit lighter than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with a little sharper screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have a same size display, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also has a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a bit better pixels number in each inch in the screen. Samsung Galaxy A52s has a lot bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s has just a little better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also has more RAM. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 counts with just a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy A52s, because it has a 12 percent greater battery capacity.
Galaxy A52s shoots much better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy A52s also has a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a back camera with way more MP and a larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.