Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-09-01 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52s has an overall score of 91.1, which is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's 81.1 general score. Galaxy A52s's design is newer, a little lighter and a little thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A52s has newer 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has Android 10, so it provides you lots of additional features and some performance improvements.
Galaxy A52s features a bit sharper screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, the Galaxy A52s also counts with a little bit better pixels count in each display inch. The Galaxy A52s has a superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1 TB and more internal memory capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's processing unit is just as good as the CPU in Galaxy A52s, they have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a little longer battery duration than Galaxy A52s, because it has a 12 percent greater battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A52s and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro both feature extremely similar cameras, and although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light photos, they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the same resolution back facing camera, a same size camera sensor and the same 3840x2160 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.