Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-09-01 | 2020-04-07 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52s is better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, with a 91.1 score against 79. The Samsung Galaxy A52s construction is newer, a little lighter and just a little thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S. These devices come with the same Android 11 operating system. The Samsung Galaxy A52s features a bit better processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with a little bit better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also counts with a just a little higher screen density. Galaxy A52s takes a little bit better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a same size diafragm aperture and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A52s also has a larger sensor capturing higher quality pictures and a back facing camera with a way higher resolution.
The Galaxy A52s features a superior storage for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because it has more internal storage capacity and an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a bit superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy A52s, because it has a 5020mAh battery size against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.