Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-09-01 | 2021-01-18 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.37 x 3.04 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Daybreak purple and Nightfall black |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 800U chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52s is just a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, getting a 91.1 score against 83. Galaxy A52s's construction is just a little bit lighter and a bit thinner than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, even though both of them were only released with a couple months difference. These phones include Android OS, but Galaxy A52s has a newer 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has Android 10.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T features a display that is very similar to the Samsung Galaxy A52s one, and although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a bit lower pixels number in each screen inch, they both have a screen of the same size. Samsung Galaxy A52s has a very superior storage capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, because it has more internal storage and a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1 TB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T's CPU is very similar to the processing unit in Samsung Galaxy A52s, and although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy A52s has a slightly better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the same diafragm aperture and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy A52s also has a larger back camera sensor providing a higher image quality and a way more megapixels back-facing camera.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has a bit better battery life than Galaxy A52s, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.