Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.1 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-10-02 |
| -- | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 6.77 ounces |
| -- | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1480 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) is much better than Samsung Galaxy A55 5G, getting an 87 score against 75.1. Both phones in this comparison review include Android operating system, but Motorola razr (2020) has an older 11 version while Samsung Galaxy A55 5G has Android 14. Motorola razr (2020) counts with a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A55 5G, although it has a bit smaller display, a bit worse resolution of 876 x 2142 and a little bit lower count of pixels per inch of screen.
The Motorola razr (2020) features a very superior hardware performance than Galaxy A55 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has 2 GB more RAM. The Motorola razr (2020) features a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy A55 5G, although it has a back-facing camera with a lower resolution.
Galaxy A55 5G features more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds up to 1 TB. Galaxy A55 5G has a superior battery performance than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 79% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.