Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.7 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-08-21 |
| -- | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| -- | 7.34 ounces |
| -- | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot better than the Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored), having a score of 98.9 against 78.7. These phones use Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has older 13 version and Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored) has Android 14. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a better display than Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored), because it has a little larger screen, a better resolution of 1440 x 3088px and a just a little better pixel density.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has an extremely better processor than Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has 4 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a much better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored), and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra captures much better photos and videos than Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored), and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a back camera with a lot better resolution, a bigger sensor shooting higher quality videos and pictures and a way better video quality.
Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored) counts with just a little better battery performance than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.