Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 78.7 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| -- | 2013-09-04 |
| -- | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 5.93 ounces |
| -- | Black, Pink and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 3 is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored), having an 81.2 score against 78.7. Both of these phones use Android OS, but the Galaxy Note 3 has 5.0 version while Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored) has Android 14. Galaxy Note 3 counts with a much faster processing unit than Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored), because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and less cores (although faster), it also counts with an additional GPU.
Galaxy Note 3 has a better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored), although it has a quite worse screen pixels density, a bit smaller display and a little worse resolution of 1920 x 1080px. Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored) has a bit more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored) features a superior battery performance than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 56% greater battery capacity. Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored) takes better photos and videos than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored) also has a way bigger camera sensor providing a much better image quality, a back-facing camera with lot more megapixels and a larger aperture to capture better images in low-light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.