Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.7 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-03-06 |
| -- | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 5.78 ounces |
| -- | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 has an overall score of 94.8, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored)'s 78.7 score. Both devices in our current comparison come with Android operating system, but Galaxy S20 has an older 13 version while Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored) has Android 14. Samsung Galaxy S20 counts with a much better display than Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored), because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better screen density and a higher 1440 x 3200 resolution.
Galaxy S20 counts with a much better processing power than Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored), and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy S20 also has a higher amount of RAM. The Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored) shoots just a bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S20, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture and the same video resolution, the Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored) also has better video frame rates, a way better 50 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera and a larger sensor shooting better quality videos and pictures.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 has a superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored), and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored) has longer battery performance than Galaxy S20, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.