Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.7 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-03-06 |
| -- | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 7.83 ounces |
| -- | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a global score of 98, which is a lot better than the Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored)'s overall score of 78.7. Both phones in this comparison come with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the previous 13 version while Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored) has Android 14.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a much greater hardware performance than Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored), and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a better display than Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored), because it has a higher pixel density, a better 1440 x 3200px resolution and a bit bigger display.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a way bigger storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored), and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's battery life is just as good as the Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored) one.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G takes better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored), because although it has a lot tinier back-facing camera sensor shooting much worse quality videos and pictures, and they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also counts with a way better 7680x4320 video resolution and a camera with a lot higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.