Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.7 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2018-03-16 |
| -- | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 5.75 ounces |
| -- | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S9 has a global score of 83.3, which is a bit better than the Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored)'s 78.7 score. The Galaxy S9 counts with a much greater hardware performance than Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored), although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. Samsung Galaxy S9 has a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored), because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher amount of pixels per inch in the screen and a higher 1440 x 2960px resolution.
Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored) counts with a superior camera than Galaxy S9, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for capturing pictures and videos in low light environments and lower video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored) also counts with a much bigger camera sensor which provides a much higher photo and video quality and a much more megapixels camera in the back.
Samsung Galaxy S9 counts with a greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored), because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 400 GB. Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored) has a really longer battery performance than Galaxy S9, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.