Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2018-05-22 | 2019-09-20 |
| 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 109.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 8.73 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3969mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max has a score of 85.3, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy A6's overall score of 75.8. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max construction is newer than Samsung Galaxy A6's, although it's just a little bit thicker and way heavier. The iPhone 11 Pro Max counts with a better CPU than Galaxy A6, because although it has 2 less cores (although faster), it also counts with a 64 bits processor and a greater amount of RAM memory.
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max has a way better looking screen than Galaxy A6, because it has a much greater number of pixels per inch of screen, a larger display and a lot higher resolution of 1242 x 2688. The Galaxy A6 has a very superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than iPhone 11 Pro Max, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 400 GB.
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max shoots a bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A6, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture and a way lower 12 mega pixels resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a bigger sensor providing a higher image quality.
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max counts with improved battery lifetime than Galaxy A6, because it has a 3969mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Although iPhone 11 Pro Max is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy A6. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy iPhone 11 Pro Max, else you can save some dollars and get the Galaxy A6, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.