Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 88.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x, 14.x |
| 2018-05-22 | 2020-10-23 |
| 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender | Black, Blue, Green, Purple, Red and White |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 109.00 | $ 829.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.73 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2815mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 12 is much better than the Galaxy A6, with an 88.7 score against 75.8. The Apple iPhone 12 is a a lot newer and just a bit thinner device than the Galaxy A6, although it's also a little bit heavier. The Apple iPhone 12 counts with an extremely better processor than Galaxy A6, because although it has a lower number of cores (but faster), it also counts with a larger amount of RAM memory and a 64-bits processing unit.
IPhone 12 features an incredibly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a little bigger screen, a way better 1170 x 2532 resolution and a lot greater pixels density. The iPhone 12 features a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A6, because although it has a back camera with a much worse 12 megapixels resolution, it also counts with a way better (4K) video resolution and a larger aperture to capture better low-light images and videos.
Samsung Galaxy A6 features much more storage to store more games and applications than iPhone 12, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 400 GB. Galaxy A6 counts with a bit better battery performance than Apple iPhone 12, because it has a 3000mAh battery size.
Although Apple iPhone 12 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy A6. So if you want that extra features, you can buy Apple iPhone 12, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the Galaxy A6, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.