Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x, 14.x |
| 2018-05-22 | 2020-10-23 |
| 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 5.78 x 2.82 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.66 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender | Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver |
| Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 109.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.73 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2815mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 12 Pro is much better than the Galaxy A6, having a score of 92.8 against 75.8. The Apple iPhone 12 Pro is a notably newer and a little thinner device than the Galaxy A6, although it is also somewhat heavier. The iPhone 12 Pro counts with a very superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy A6, because although it has a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bits processor and more RAM.
The Apple iPhone 12 Pro features an incredibly better looking display than Galaxy A6, because it has a little bit larger display, a way greater screen pixel density and a much higher resolution of 1170 x 2532 pixels. The iPhone 12 Pro features a bit more memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A6, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
IPhone 12 Pro takes just a bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A6, because although it has a camera in the back with a much worse resolution, it also counts with a way higher video resolution and a bigger aperture to take better low light photography and video. Samsung Galaxy A6 features just a bit better battery lifetime than Apple iPhone 12 Pro, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity against 2815mAh.
Although iPhone 12 Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Samsung Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Samsung Galaxy A6. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy A6, and give up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.