Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 93.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x, 14.x |
| 2018-05-22 | 2020-11-13 |
| 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 8.03 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender | Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver |
| Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 109.00 | $ 1100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2778 x 1284 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.73 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3687mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone 12 Pro Max is a lot better than the Samsung Galaxy A6, getting a 93.2 score against 75.8. The iPhone 12 Pro Max body is incredibly newer and a little bit thinner, but also notably heavier than Samsung Galaxy A6. IPhone 12 Pro Max features a much more vibrant screen than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a way better pixels density, a lot better resolution of 1284 x 2778px and a bigger display.
IPhone 12 Pro Max features a way better performance than Samsung Galaxy A6, because although it has less processing cores , it also counts with a higher amount of RAM and a 64 bits processor. IPhone 12 Pro Max features a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy A6, because although it has a back-facing camera with a way lower resolution, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 video quality and a larger diafragm aperture to take better low light photography.
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max features a little bit better storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A6, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max counts with superior battery performance than Galaxy A6, because it has 3687mAh of battery capacity.
Although iPhone 12 Pro Max is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy A6. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get Galaxy A6, giving up a couple features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.