Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 93.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x |
| 2018-05-22 | 2021-09-24 |
| 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 109.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2778 x 1284 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.73 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone 13 Pro Max is a lot better than Samsung Galaxy A6, with a overall score of 93.2 against 75.8. The iPhone 13 Pro Max design has the same thickness than the Samsung Galaxy A6, but it's a lot heavier. The iPhone 13 Pro Max features a much better hardware performance than Galaxy A6, because although it has a lower number of cores (although faster), it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit and a larger amount of RAM memory.
IPhone 13 Pro Max has a way better display than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a lot better pixels quantity per inch in the screen, a lot better 1284 x 2778 resolution and a larger screen. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max has a slightly better camera than Galaxy A6, because although it has a much lower 12 megapixels resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a larger camera aperture.
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max has a little bit more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A6, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage capacity. The iPhone 13 Pro Max features a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy A6, because it has a 4352mAh battery size.
Although Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy A6. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the Galaxy A6, resigning a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.