Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 94.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| -- | iOS 16.x |
| 2018-05-22 | 2022-09-16 |
| 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.33 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender | Deep Purple, Gold, Silver and Space Black |
| Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 109.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2796 x 1290 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 460 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Apple 16 Bionic (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3460 MHz processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Apple GPU 5-core GPU |
| 8.73 | 10.8 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | -- |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4323mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max is way better than the Galaxy A6, with a 94.9 score against 75.8. The Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max body is noticeably newer than the Galaxy A6's, although it is noticeably heavier and a little thicker. IPhone 14 Pro Max has a much better performance than Samsung Galaxy A6, because although it has an inferior number of cores , it also counts with 3 GB more RAM and a 64 bits processor.
The iPhone 14 Pro Max features a lot better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a larger screen, a way better 1290 x 2796 resolution and a way better display pixel density. IPhone 14 Pro Max counts with a little bit more memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A6, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max features a really longer battery life than Galaxy A6, because it has a 44 percent more battery size. IPhone 14 Pro Max takes much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A6, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a way higher resolution camera.
Although iPhone 14 Pro Max is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Samsung Galaxy A6. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the iPhone 14 Pro Max, else you can save a couple dollars and get the Samsung Galaxy A6, letting go a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.