Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| 2018-05-22 | 2017-11-03 |
| 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender | Silver and Space gray |
| Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 109.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 8.73 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone X has a global score of 88.1, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy A6's global score of 75.8. The Apple iPhone X body has the same thickness than the Samsung Galaxy A6, but it's a little heavier. Apple iPhone X features a better processor than Galaxy A6, because although it has an inferior number of cores (but faster), and they both have a 3 GB RAM, the Apple iPhone X also counts with a 64-bits processor.
Apple iPhone X features an incredibly better display than Galaxy A6, because it has a little bigger display, a lot higher resolution of 1125 x 2436 and a way higher quantity of pixels per inch of display. The iPhone X counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy A6, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor, a smaller camera aperture and a camera with lot less mega pixels, it also counts with a lot higher video definition.
The Apple iPhone X has a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A6, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage. The Galaxy A6 has just a bit longer battery performance than iPhone X, because it has a 10 percent larger battery capacity.
Although iPhone X is a better device, it costs a lot more than Samsung Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Samsung Galaxy A6. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the iPhone X, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the Samsung Galaxy A6, giving up some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.