Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2018-05-22 | 2016-10-20 |
| 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender | Black, Gray and White |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 109.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 5 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.73 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel has a global score of 80.2, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy A6's 75.8 overall score. The Google Pixel is an older and somewhat thicker phone than the Galaxy A6, but Google made it lighter anyway. The Google Pixel counts with a bit better processing power than Galaxy A6, because although it has an inferior number of cores , it also counts with more RAM memory.
The Google Pixel has a more vivid display than Galaxy A6, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better 1080 x 1920 resolution and a better display pixel density. Google Pixel counts with just a bit bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A6, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Google Pixel takes clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy A6, because although it has a way worse resolution camera and a smaller aperture, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 video quality and a larger sensor. The Galaxy A6 counts with a bit longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel, because it has a 3000mAh battery size.
Although Google Pixel is a better device, it is way more expensive than Samsung Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Samsung Galaxy A6. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy A6, giving up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.