Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2018-05-22 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender | Black, Pink and White |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 109.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 XL has a global score of 80.7, which is just a bit better than Galaxy A6's global score of 75.8. Even being the best in this comparison review, it must be noted that it's also a bit thicker and somewhat heavier. The Google Pixel 3 XL features a bit superior CPU than Galaxy A6, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Google Pixel 3 XL also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Google Pixel 3 XL features a much better looking screen than Galaxy A6, because it has a bit bigger display, a much better 1440 x 2960 resolution and a much better pixels count per screen inch. Google Pixel 3 XL has a bit better camera than Galaxy A6, because although it has a much less mega-pixels back facing camera and a smaller aperture, it also counts with a larger sensor and a way higher 3840x2160 video quality.
Galaxy A6 features a much bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows up to 400 GB. Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a bit longer battery life than Galaxy A6, because it has a 3430mAh battery size.
Although Google Pixel 3 XL is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Samsung Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Samsung Galaxy A6. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Google Pixel 3 XL, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the Samsung Galaxy A6, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.